Saturday, November 28, 2009

Garden 29 November 2009



Nasturtiums and lettuce grown from seed, ready for planting today

Chilli from seedlings


Coriander from seeds
nner
Mint from a runner given by a friend


Chilli from a pot from bunnings


Basil from seeds


Cosmos from seeds


Flowers from pots


More flowers from some pots $2 each & seedling tray

Friday, November 27, 2009

A politician who nearly sounds real

Malcolm Turnbull, a politician in extremis, has lost some of his stridency, he is being almost statesman like on climate change by adopting a bi-partisan approach.

I have been dismissive of him up until now, but his determination to drag his climate change denying party members into the light of reason has lifted him up in my estimation.

But, like KRudd, he is still soft on the polluters, it is like rewarding bank robbers with faster get away cars

It is shame that principles are so rarely exhibited by our elected representatives.

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Gardening


coriander







We have planted stuff in the garden.

Herbs and flowers, some as seedlings and others as flowers, the above is lemongrass.

beside the driveway, cosmos in the foreground



Flowers plus spring onion - we didn't plant it but somehow it is there


near front door


we are growing nasturtiums and lettuce from seed - these are seedlings 3 weeks old




Basil also being grown from seed


Chilli from seed


Mint from runner, chilli from a bought seedling and coriander from seed

We are very happy with the way stuff is growing - will update shortly

Monday, November 16, 2009

Mealy-mouthed non-apologies

The trite line "if I have offended anyone, I apologise" is such a crock.

The deliverers of the line have said something that people have objected to so strongly that even the thickhead who uttered the original statement knows that he did the wrong thing.

The apology is worthless when it is subject to such conditions.

A true apology would be along the lines of, "when said x about y, I was wrong, I have hurt the person and I am sorry that I hurt them."

Why does the injured party ask/demand an apology? Easy, because they have been hurt and/or offended.

A certain well-publicised case featured the classic phrase "{lawyer} apologised ''if she suffered any hurt or distress''" - I repeat, if she was not hurt or offended, she would not have pursued the issue  through the courts.

Further, it is interesting to note that the perpetrator offered no apology of any description.

An aged sportsman, notorious for attempting to be young by squiring nymphets, showed a disctinct lack of sportsmanship by not accepting the umpire's decision.

Meanwhile, his employers through their tame minions on a current affairs light entertainment show allege he is a good guy by providing a role model.  The sports chap has by revealing his prostate condition has apparently encouraged other men to be checked for cancer.

He is a good role model, yeah right!  This same buffoon says to ignore his fellow "stars" on his show when they exhibit drunken, violent behaviour because they aren't role models! Hypocrite!!

Big is not beautiful - urban sprawl

Our cities are growing like topsy. And that growth is creating problems for us, environmentally, socially and economically.

Those areas are intertwined; government says it can’t do something about the environment because they think it will be economically not optimal. Social alienation and economic disadvantage and can be linked to destructive behaviour like littering.

The “cars that ate Paris” have turned their attentions to Melbourne. The urban sprawl means that cars are being used excessively.
We need to get smarter.


Expansion horizontally into areas with no public transport and with large distances to anywhere is a recipe for disaster and it is being followed in Melbourne and Sydney even as I write.

Travelling 3 to 4 hours a day to get to work sitting in your car is bad for you, family suffers (because you are away from spouse and children), health suffers (being inactive in a stressful situation surrounded by fumes), wealth suffers (you and your spouse, and maybe kids, need more than just the “family” car) and it is bad for the rest of us as well – pollution, increased costs of production and costs of trauma via collisions.

If we could conveniently walk or take public transport to work, so many resources would be freed up.

Higher density housing closer to the CBD is a solution. Time to start thinking about having houses that more sustainable, not having a mansion miles from civilisation.

And using what is now productive farm land to grow bricks seems such a waste!

Bike helmets and fines

Police on bikes at the local station stopped a number of people for not wearing helmets. Fair enough, but then I considered the penalty these people faced, a fine of $50.

The riders, there were three of them, included a woman, probably in her fifties, who looked as though she may have been a pensioner - the bike was old, she was wearing a dress, and of course, no helmet.

Having been knocked off my bike and hitting the ground head first, I am glad I was wearing a helmet - the helmet shattered, I was concussed which is a far, far better result than skull shattered and dead! So I understand the value of helmets.

The less well-off would struggle to pay the fine - it represents a considerable slug of their income (most of which is probably not disposable anyway!).

My solutions:-

One, make the fine a percentage of income - the poor can afford the fine and if a highly paid person gets a high fine, well, you wonder why they are paid heaps when thy are patently stupid to not wear a helmet!

or

Two, just like cars with an unroadworthy sticker, the rider must present themselves at the local police station with a helmet (educative and not as expensive as the fine!) if it is their first offence, for subsequent nabbings, then hit them with the fine.

Thursday, November 12, 2009